The double dual trick to construct a better object from the existing one

Stone–Čech compactification One of the proof of the Stone–Čech compactification is to consider the continuous functions from a given topological space $X$ to $[0, 1]$. Crux 1: constructing $[0, 1]^{C}$ Let $C$ be the space of all continuous functions from $X$ to $[0, 1]$, consider $[0, 1]^{C}$, there is a natural map from $X$ to $[0, 1]^{C}$: for each $x \in X$, define $\phi(x) = f \mapsto f(x)$. With product topology $\phi$ is continuous....

July 31, 2025 · updated August 1, 2025 · 6 min ·  mathematics

Playful observations with deformation retracts and path connected-ness

I was going through a problem in Lee’s Topological Manifolds book1 (problem 7-12). It states that the infinite broom has a strong deformation retract to $(0, 0)$ but not for $(1, 0)$ (only a deformation retract). Below is some of my playful observations inspired by this problem. (Not restricted to the infinite broom space.) Inifinite Broom Note that the deformation retract to $(0, 0)$ itselfs imply the deformation retract to $(1, 0)$, since one can define the deformation retract to $(1, 0)$ by “first retract to $(0, 0)$, then push it to the point $(1, 0)$ along the line joining these two points”....

July 21, 2025 · updated July 26, 2025 · 7 min ·  mathematics

Amazed by how ring theory can be linked up to topology

I am reviewing some fundamental algebra, and I just learnt something beautifully suggesting the connection of ring theory and geometry, which made me eager to learn some algebraic geometry (which I was not very interested when I was in undergrad). It is an exercise in Aluffi’s book1. Lets’ jump into it. The problem Let $K$ be a compact topological space, and let $R$ be the ring of continuous real-valued functions on $K$, with addition and multiplication defined pointwise....

June 26, 2025 · updated June 29, 2025 · 7 min ·  mathematics

A more intuitive explanation of Burnside's lemma

Warning You need to know some basic group theory terminology to appreciate(I hope you do) the following content. Burnside’s lemma Here is the statement of the Burnside’s lemma: Let $G$ be a group that actions on a set $X$. Denote $X^{g}$ the set of fixed points of $g$ i.e. $\{x \in X | g \cdot x = x\}$, then the number of orbits of the action is equal to $\dfrac{1}{|G|}\sum\limits_{g \in G} |X^g|$....

April 10, 2025 · updated April 10, 2025 · 5 min ·  mathematics

An elementary solution of a weird intergal problem (Putnam 1985 A5)

Problem Let $I_{m} = \int^{2\pi}_{0} \cos(x)\cos(2x)\dots\cos(mx) dx$. For $m$ in $1, 2, \dots, 10$, for which $m$ is $I_m \neq 0$ ? Solution $I_m$ is non-zero if and only if $m \equiv 0, 3 \pmod{4}$. Main idea The official(seemingly? It is in the putnam problem book and a few solutions I found online do the same.) solution is to substitute $\cos x = \frac{e^{ix} + e^{-ix}}{2}$ followed by grouping the terms into $\cos x \cos (2x) \dots \cos (mx) = e^{\text{something}}$, and analyze the something....

April 5, 2025 · updated April 6, 2025 · 3 min ·  mathematics